[ppml] Getting aggressive about vetting
Ted Mittelstaedt
tedm at ipinc.net
Thu Mar 15 21:18:54 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Getting aggressive about vetting
- Next message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>-----Original Message----- >From: John Curran [mailto:jcurran at istaff.org] >Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 5:19 PM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: ppml at arin.net >Subject: Re: [ppml] Getting aggressive about vetting > > >At 4:00 PM -0700 3/15/07, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >>If ARIN and the other registries do NOT "do the right thing" and get >>agressive about "vetting" the IP allocations, but merely continue to >>act as "stewards" then we will have a failure, ... > >Ted - > > I suspect that ARIN will get as aggressive about "vetting" > IP allocations (new, existing, or both) as ARIN's approved > Internet resource policies allow. The cool thing is that > you (collective) get to actual set the policies. The downside > is that there has to be an actual policy proposal before > there can be any new policy... > > What do you propose? ARIN ask for a third-party audits > of IP address usage? Perhaps company officers should > actually sign & attest to the accuracy of the applications? > Should ARIN partner with equipment manufacturers to > insert secret hidden remote monitoring options?? There > is a very wide range of possible ways that RIR's can get > more aggressive in vetting new (and existing) resource > allocations, but you've got to be a little more specific > so that a proposal can be: 1) Written, 2) Approved, and > 3) Implemented by ARIN. > I think that this should go in stages, you see. There is going to have to be a lot of work in bringing space under registry control first, obviously. But, eventually your going to have to confront the idea of how to audit. In the United States the IRS does tax audits based on a secret algorithm they use when looking at tax returns. It seems to me that such a computer program could be designed for ARIN that would read through all assignments and cough up a list of likely audit candidates. For example, if an organization has not changed a SWIP in over 5 years, that might increase it's chances of getting an IP audit. An IP audit could consist of nothing more than ARIN sending a letter to the administrative contact requesting a signed statement from the contact that the allocation is still being used. My guess is that doing some very simple things like this would likely uncover a large amount of unused space. Ted
- Previous message: [ppml] Getting aggressive about vetting
- Next message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list