[ppml] Transfers and Fees (was: something else, from a week ago)
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Wed Mar 14 17:17:31 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Transfers and Fees (was: something else, from a week ago)
- Next message: [ppml] Initiation of Petition was Re: Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I don't entirely agree with that. We try not to use fees as a > bludgeon, although I admit one of the reasons for maintenance fees > is to make sure there's somebody still at the other end. The very fact that ARIN holds the addresses as uniquely registered for an organization's use is a benefit to the organization. The maintenance fee is for that service because without fee income, ARIN cannot maintain the registry. In addition, ARIN provides in-addr.arpa services that all block holders benefit from. And if an org is no longer benefiting from holding a uniquely registered block of addresses, then it can no longer justify their use. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] Transfers and Fees (was: something else, from a week ago)
- Next message: [ppml] Initiation of Petition was Re: Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list