[ppml] Initiation of Petition was Re: Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
Edward Lewis
Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz
Wed Mar 14 08:32:59 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Initiation of Petition was Re: Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Initiation of Petition was Re: Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Okay, so this is what my "petition/protest" mail was all about: From before (to make sure it counts under the rules): I would like to voice a qualified "I object" to this rejection. I would like to see some discussion on this, even though I comprehend the reasons given below for the rejection and acknowledge that they are valid. My motivation for speaking up is to see if there might be a way that the spirit of the proposal can be pushed forward in ARIN even if the particular proposal has mechanics that are problematic. At this point, I don't have a specific recommendation, just wanted to say that there might be a reason to reconsider this, perhaps in another form. At 16:57 +0900 3/14/07, Toshiyuki Hosaka wrote: >Dear All, > >This is a formal petition request to advance the policy proposal >entitled "IPv4 >Countdown Policy Proposal". The full text of the proposal is posted >on the ARIN >website at the following URL: > > http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2007-February/006000.html > >This policy proposal was to respond in an orderly way to the >upcoming exhaustion >of the IPv4 address space. The AC rejected this proposal due to anti-trust >issues however I strongly believe that we should discuss this kind >of policy in >the ARIN open policy forum, rather than simple rejection, since IPv4 address >exhaustion is so important issue to the whole community. > >According to the Internet Policy Evaluation Process, people who wish >to document >their support for the petition must do the following within the next >five (5) days: > > 1) post a response to the Public Policy Mailing List stating their > support for the proposal, > > and, > > 2) send email to petition at arin.net with full point of contact > information, including their telephone number and organizational > affiliation. > >If you have any questions about this process you can refer to the ARIN website >at http://www.arin.net/policy/ipep.html for the full text explaining the >petition process. > >Thanks and best regards, >Toshi >-- >Toshiyuki Hosaka <hosaka at nic.ad.jp> >JPNIC > > > >Member Services wrote (2007/03/03 2:47): >> On 1 March 2007 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) concluded its review of >> the proposed policy 'IPv4 Countdown' and did not accept it as a formal >> policy proposal. >> >> The AC rejected this proposal having taken into consideration the >> anti-trust issues raised by the ARIN General Counsel and because the AC >> deemed the proposal to be contrary to ARIN's mission. >> >> During the initial review period the AC may decide to: >> 1) Accept the proposal as a formal policy proposal as it is presented, >> 2) Work with the author to clarify, divide or combine it with another >> proposal, or >> 3) Not accept the policy proposal. >> >> In the event that the AC decides not to accept the proposed policy, then >> the author may elect to use the petition process to advance the >> proposal. For petition details see the section called "Petition >> Process" in the ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process which >> can be found at: >> http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html >> >> The deadline for the author to initiate a petition per the ARIN Internet >> Resource Policy Evaluation Process is 40 days prior to the meeting; the >> petition deadline for the ARIN XIX Public Policy Meeting >> is 14 March 2007. If the author chooses not to petition or the petition >> is unsuccessful, then the proposed policy is closed. If a petition is >> successful, then the proposal will be numbered and posted for discussion >> and presented at ARIN's Public Policy Meeting. >> >> The proposed policy text can be found at: >> http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2007-February/006000.html >> >> Regards, >> >> Member Services >> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PPML mailing list >> PPML at arin.net >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml >> > > >_______________________________________________ >PPML mailing list >PPML at arin.net >http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar Sarcasm doesn't scale.
- Previous message: [ppml] Initiation of Petition was Re: Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Initiation of Petition was Re: Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list