[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-8: Transfer Policy Clarifications
David E. Smith
dave at mvn.net
Fri Mar 9 19:34:12 EST 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-8: Transfer Policy Clarifications
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-8: Transfer Policy Clarifications
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > Last I knew, malicious attacks over the network are illegal. If a hosting > authority was in charge of an IP block that an attack was originating > from and they refused to disclose who launched the attack, (if in the US) > the FBI would file charges against them. You bet I'd see them in court > just like any victim of any other kind of crime would see the perp in court. > If the FBI or another LEO of competent jurisdiction shows up with a court order, I'll delightfully turn over the requested information. If you (in the sense of "some other network operator," not you personally) ask nicely, I may or may not provide you with information. If you start making demands, I'll just get cranky. To the best of my knowledge, I'm not under any /legal/ obligation to publicly identify all my customers to the world. I'm under obligation from ARIN to identify a few (the dozen or so that have eight or more IP addresses allocated to them), but that's pretty much it. > This is in fact exactly why the Motion Picture and Sound Association offers > ISP's immunity for prosecution in exchange for the ISP signing a contract > that allows them to get information about the ISP's customers who are downloading > or uploading pirated music. No ISP would sign such a thing if they didn't > have liability under the law. > Not necessarily. The RIAA has a history of making lawsuits with unreasonable demands (suing college students for millions of dollars), then settling out-of-court under slightly more reasonable terms. It's not too much of a stretch to say the MPAA might possibly use similar tactics with ISPs. They probably have a bigger budget, and better lawyers, than many ISPs. I don't have any proof of this, having never been on the business end of one of these suits, but it's quite plausible. David Smith MVN.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20070309/466a1073/attachment.html
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-8: Transfer Policy Clarifications
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-8: Transfer Policy Clarifications
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list