[ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Fri Jun 8 04:05:45 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Next message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > I mean an internet (a network of networks) between different > > organizations, but not (directly) accessible to the Internet. > > that's far from definitive. first off, by "the Internet" you > seem to mean what some people call the default free zone > (DFZ) but you might be using breidbart's definition, which > i've quoted a time or two here recently but here it is again: > > >> But what *IS* the internet? > > It's the largest equivalence class in the reflexive transitive > > symmetric closure of the relationship "can be reached by an IP > > packet from". --Seth Breidbart I think he is using his own definition, not some witty mathematico-grammatical repartee from someone I've never heard of. Let's stick with John's clear and understandable definition and lose the tortured prose of this Breidbart fellow. > second and more importantly, if i'm a member of more than one > of these "private internets," say one between "different > organzations" A,B,C,D and one between "different > organizations" D,E,F,G where i am "D", what am i? You are a typical enterprise network. In other words, the situation that you describe is rather common. > third and finally, if the rest of the world nukes itself in > spam and ddos and "different organizations" A,B,C,D,E,F,G > decide to form their own "the internet", or are the last > networks standing after the spamocaust such that we qualify > under breidbart's definition, then what am i? Then you are committed to a mental institution after overdosing on a cocktail of drugs. Where else would you get the idea that spam and ddos cause nuclear holocaust. This is a reductio ad absurdum if ever I saw one. > a network is "private" if it's not connected to most other > networks, but clearly it could still be connected to some > other networks and still be "private". Not under the RFC 1918 definition. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Next message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list