[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Thu Jun 7 10:21:28 EDT 2007


Hi Roque,

This is something that never is defined by the policies. It is up to the
board to decide and I'm fine with board decisions on this. If you don't,
they you should make sure to select a different board composition next time
:-).

Regards,
Jordi





De: Roque Gagliano <rgaglian at antel.net.uy>
Responder a: <ppml-bounces at arin.net>
Fecha: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 10:56:32 -0300
Para: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
CC: Thomas Narten <narten at us.ibm.com>, <ppml at arin.net>,
<address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Asunto: Re: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again

more "practical" questions:
why should they be cheaper than PI block? do they take
less administrative work form RIR? do they take less "space" in their
databases? 

in many RIRs you need to pay a "membership" fee and doing so you get the
right to vote in their members meetings, if you get an ULA-C allocation,
should you be considered a member? would you pay your membership fee to the
RIR? again, why should this allocation be cheaper that a PI allocation?

Roque


On Jun 7, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Randy Bush wrote:

>> Should ULA-C be published in the Whois database? what about reverse DNS
>> for them, should they be delegated or just reply a NXDOMAIN?
>>  
> 
> let's see.  ula-c should be assigned and tracked by rirs.  they should
> have whois and in-addr.arpa.  do remind me how they differ from pi
> space.  i keep forgetting.
> 
> randy
>  

 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Roque Gagliano
ANTEL - URUGUAY
rgaglian at antel.net.uy


 



_______________________________________________
This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List
(PPML at arin.net).
Manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.






More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list