[ppml] alternative realities (was PIv6 for legacy holders (/wRSA + efficient use))

On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:

> 
> If so, then they are not in compliance with global policies on IPv4
> allocation. The only entities that I know of who are in this postion are
> so-called legacy holders such as MIT. But I do not believe that entities
> like MIT have a right to monetize their IPv4 addresses when the vast
> majority of industry is playing by the rules and has no surplus.

MIT has just as much right to monetize their IPv4 address space as does
British Telecom.

		--Dean

-- 
Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000