[ppml] Legacy users and ARIN duties
Cliff Bedore
cliffb at cjbsys.bdb.com
Fri Jul 27 09:37:09 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Soliciting comments: IPv4 to IPv6 fast migration
- Next message: [ppml] Legacy users and ARIN duties
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
As a legacy address holder and newcomer to the list, I'm a little concerned about all the effort to get us to join ARIN/sign RSAs etc. I've had my Class C (/24 for the newbies :-) ) since 1990. Until I was invited to join this list, I have had virtually no interface with ARIN. I think there were a few changes made over the years as I switched providers but mostly no contact. When we got our addresses, there were no ISPs. Companies/groups/individuals got addresses to connect to the internet not to make a business of getting others connected to the internet. Our needs were fairly static for the most part. The world changed but we were left alone for 15-17 years. Now as IPv4 space is getting low, everyone wants us to in some way legitimatize our status. Like common law marriage after 7 years, I think our status is established by custom that is recognized as valid. If there is really going to be an IPv6 Internet "real soon now" why the hell does anybody care about getting fees/RSAs from the legacy holders of IPv4 address space after all these years. The only reason I can think of is that nobody really believes IPv6 is going to happen and all that legacy space (however much that is) is beginning to look more and more attractive as there is less and less available. People are sharpening their knives at how to carve up the legacy space. If IANA/ARIN/other RIRs are serious about IPv6, they would be much better off trying to get IPv6 going rather than chase legacy users for their space. If IPv6 is going to happen and the legacy users are going to be around, they will need IPv6 space and will join the community and sign the proper RSAs when they do. Would it be good stewardship for ARIN to develop a v6/v4 gateway that was freely available for various ISPs to use to induce IPv6 adoption? Personally, the more I hear about IPv6, the more I am reminded of the OSI/GOSIP fiasco of the early 90s. OSI was too big, too complicated and had too many "undefineds". IPv6 is beginning to look the same way. I personally think that some big company is going to start their own separate IPv4 space, develop big gateways and double the size of the Internet without requiring any change to any equipment on either side of the gateway. Don't ask me how, I don't know but I'll bet somebody can do it. Maybe they'll call the domain .FUV6. :-) Seriously, I think ARIN is wasting its time trying to do anything with legacy space. If they really want IPv6 to take off, the sooner v4 disappears, the sooner v6 will happen. It's like they have a split personality and want to keep both. Cliff
- Previous message: [ppml] Soliciting comments: IPv4 to IPv6 fast migration
- Next message: [ppml] Legacy users and ARIN duties
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list