[ppml] Incentive to legacy address holders

[John Santos]

On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:

> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of
> >John Santos
> >Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 6:47 PM
> >To: Leo Bicknell
> >Cc: ppml at arin.net
> >Subject: Re: [ppml] Incentive to legacy address holders
> >
> >
> >Under these circumstances, I can't see any sense in doing anything
> >else but what we are doing now, continuing as a legacy, non-RSA-
> >signing holder.
> >
> 
> I guess you think your pretty smart in that you have outlined a
> situation you think isn't solvable in IPv4.
> 
> So, when all your customers have switched over to IPv6 and are
> demanding that you do the same, it appears to me you will be still
> in exactly the same circumstances.  You customers will still be natting
> under IPv6 - if you don't think so, go ask them now.
> 
> So what are you going to do then
> Mr. Smarty?  You won't have any legacy class C to fall back on since
> there isn't an equivalent in IPv6?

What a jerk!!!  I described precisely and accurately as I could
my exact situation.  If you think it is invented, then you are
totally full of it.

> People can always justify not even trying to follow the rules.

Bull.  I followed the rules, as written, in 1993.

> 
> Ted
> 
> PS  Cisco wrote back-to-back translation to solve exactly this issue.
> 
> 

-- 
John Santos
Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc.
781-861-0670 ext 539