[ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Jul 3 14:00:16 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> If no portion of the block appears in the DFZ, then ARIN would attempt to > contact the last known holder (and any likely successors in interest) to ask > if the block was in private use. If they were unable to get any response, > or if the response was negative, then it would be assumed to be dead and > subject to reclamation. and three years later, the holder decides to announce and it becomes lawyerville. there is a root problem. rightly or wrongly, folk were given space with what we would consider today to be insufficient constraints on contact, fees. justification of need, ... that was a contract, whether we like it or not. the world has changed. we would like to change those contracts. well, we're gonna have to *negotiate* that. and acting unilaterally or arbitrarily will only polarize and make a mess we just don't need. randy
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list