[ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
Leo Bicknell
bicknell at ufp.org
Mon Jul 2 16:59:20 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In a message written on Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 08:36:21PM +0000, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > ARIN does have an obligation to these address holders... the long/lean of > the argument is that they received their addresses under certain > terms and conditions... and forcing changes on those t&c's in a > unilateral manner might be problematic. Just like folks who signed Or not. Some of us registered our domain names back at a time when they were free. At some point NSF/NSI decided we should pay a yearly fee, and simply started charging it. There was no revolt. APNIC passed a policy (prop-018) that required all legacy space holders in that region to sign a service agreement and cryptographically protect their resource records. There was no revolt. Let's put the cards on the table. If ARIN were to pass a policy "All legacy holders must sign an RSA by December 31, 2008 or their entries will be removed from whois and in-addr.arpa." who would sue? And yes, I mean sue because I'm sure a number of people would complain that they had to do it, but who thinks they have a strong enough case, and that it's worth spending $200k on court costs rather than agreeing to a $100 per year fee? Legacy holders WILL NEVER like being brought into the system. If I had a legacy assignment I would hold out as long as possible, and throw up every bit of FUD I could find. But at the end of the day I'd know I should be part of the system, and that it's far cheaper and easier to be a part of the system then to rebel. I am in support of Owens polcy in general, with the one issue being the one I've already posted -- nothing new from ARIN without a signed RSA. However this carrot, such as it is, should be followed up with a stick, weilded as gently as possible. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20070702/0b8067a7/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list