[ppml] Policy Proposal: Decreasing Exponential Rationing of IPv4 IP Addresses
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Wed Aug 22 18:54:24 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Decreasing Exponential Rationing ofIPv4 IP Addresses
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Decreasing Exponential Rationing of IPv4 IP Addresses
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 20-aug-2007, at 16:29, Member Services wrote: > Policy Proposal Name: Decreasing Exponential Rationing of IPv4 IP > Addresses I'm opposed to this policy. The main reason is because its premise is flawed: the policy supposes that making sure we don't run out of IPv4 address space the next 10 years is better than the situation where we do run out. However, addresses that sit in the ARIN warehouse unused don't do the community any good, while more stringent rules are harmful, because they make new deployments harder, take longer, and increase risks. Also, the policy doesn't describe a workable practice for the ARIN staff. What if 8 requests come in, 4 for 1 million addresses and 4 for 250000, and the current rationing is for 4 million? Do 4 people get their million and the 4 others get nothing? Or 7 get everything and one gets nothing? Or they all get 80%? In that case, the people who need 250000 will obviously ask for 400000 so they get 285000 but the big ones only get 700000. Or do the small ones get everything they ask for and the big ones only 75%? If you only get a percentage of the address space you need, this is nearly as harmful as not getting anything at all. And the benefits of gaming the system increase astronomically, so "address request fraud" will become much more common. As I said, rationing IPv4 addresses is a bad idea. But if the community wants to do it, there are better ways. Besides, something similar to rationing will happen by itself: around 10% of all requests is for 90% of the yearly address space used, meaning that it's for very large address blocks. At some point, these blocks will no longer be available. But the other 90% of the requests that only use up 15 - 20 million addresses a year can still be fullfilled from smaller blocks that remain available and from address space that is reclaimed. (This is more than 10 million addresses per year.) So small amounts of IPv4 address space will remain available in some form for years to come, the "running out" moment is the point where the largest requests, done but the world's largest ISPs, can no longer be fullfilled.
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Decreasing Exponential Rationing ofIPv4 IP Addresses
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Decreasing Exponential Rationing of IPv4 IP Addresses
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list