[ppml] Motivating migration to IPv6

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of
>Ted Mittelstaedt
>Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 11:10 AM
>To: David E. Smith; ppml at arin.net
>Subject: Re: [ppml] Motivating migration to IPv6
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of
>>David E. Smith
>>Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 8:30 AM
>>To: ppml at arin.net
>>Subject: Re: [ppml] Motivating migration to IPv6
>>
>>
>>Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>>
>>> My proposal that orgs pay either their v4 fees or v6 fees, whichever is
>>> more, has the same long-term effect without the unintended consequences.
>>
>>Now this is a proposal I can get behind. :)
>>
>
>I had thought that someone else was already working on a proposal
>like this, I've seen this discussed before on this list.
>

oops, refer to thread titled " clarification of IPv4 and IPv6 fees"

Ted
>