[ppml] alternative realities (was PIv6 for legacy holders(/wRSA + efficient use))
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Wed Aug 1 18:40:10 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] alternative realities (was PIv6 for legacy holders(/w RSA + efficient use))
- Next message: [ppml] ARIN Board Statement on the Future of Addressing Policy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I thought this was the IP-address-consuming community. If > this is the ISP community, then I am on the wrong mailing list. This is the open, public policy mailing list for ARIN's policy development. If you want to let ISPs drive ARIN's policy, then you are free to go elsewhere but don't complain when the new policies suit ISPs better than other IP address consumers. If I were you, I would hang around and contribute your point of view. We desperately need more diversity of ideas here, such as the papers which Lucy Lynch posted. The discussion should not be a two-sided debate, but a rambling many-sided discussion that gets us to something that is workable, useful and can be implemented in the short timeframe left for the IPv4 free pool. I'm not sure that we have a clear direction yet on what ARIN can do that is useful and is also clearly a workable solution. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] alternative realities (was PIv6 for legacy holders(/w RSA + efficient use))
- Next message: [ppml] ARIN Board Statement on the Future of Addressing Policy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list