[ppml] Metric for rejecting policy proposals: AC candidate question
Stacy Taylor
ipgoddess at gmail.com
Wed Sep 20 16:10:35 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Metric for rejecting policy proposals: AC candidate question
- Next message: [ppml] Metric for rejecting policy proposals: AC candidate question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Sam, If the AC deems an issue better handled by another path or process, it is its responsibility to pass it on. Thank you, Stacy On 9/20/06, Sam Weiler <weiler at tislabs.com> wrote: > [I originally sent this to the PPML last night, but ARIN's mail > servers wouldn't deliver it because it had too many addresses on the > CC line (to the ten AC candidates). I'm now resending it without the > CC's. While I'm specifically asking the AC candidates to respond, I'd > certainly welcome comments from others.] > > Earlier this year, the AC rejected two public policy proposals on the > grounds that the "matter ... can best be addressed by the ARIN Board > of Trustees." [1] [2] > > I'd like to hear from each of the ten AC candidates as to whether they > agree that it's appropriate to reject a policy proposal merely because > there's a "better" path for resolving the matter (rather than, for > instance, because the matter is "clearly inappropriate" for the public > policy process). > > To be clear, I'm not asking if the AC made the right call on these > particular two proposals -- I'm asking if the candidates think it is > appropriate to reject a policy proposal merely because they see a > better path to accomplishing its stated goals. (e.g., because they > think the new Consultation and Suggestion Process (ACSP) [3] is a > "better" venue for the request than the full public policy process) > > Personally, I'm disappointed that the AC would reject a policy > proposal merely because it would be "best" addressed outside the > public policy process rather than because it's "clearly inappropriate" > for the public policy process -- the public policy process should at > least be available as a fallback if the "best" path doesn't work or is > unacceptable for some reason. > > -- Sam Weiler > > [1] http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2006-May/005478.html > [2] http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2006-June/005505.html > [3] http://www.arin.net/about_us/corp_docs/acsp.html > _______________________________________________ > PPML mailing list > PPML at arin.net > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml > -- :):) /S
- Previous message: [ppml] Metric for rejecting policy proposals: AC candidate question
- Next message: [ppml] Metric for rejecting policy proposals: AC candidate question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list