[ppml] Multihome Pro Con Document

Scott Leibrand wrote:
>  If you think the IETF should be working
> on something other than shim6 or IPv4-style BGP multihoming for IPv6
> (which doesn't require anything new from the IETF), then you'd need to get
> enough people to agree with you to hold a BOF and get a new WG started.

We need more engineers experimenting with code and less trying to get
WG's started.

- Kevin