ARIN-PPML Message
[ppml] Multihome Pro Con Document
- From: Kevin Loch (kloch at kl.net)
- Date: Tue Oct 17 10:51:47 EDT 2006
- Next message: [ppml] Multihome Pro Con Document
- Previous message: [ppml] Multihome Pro Con Document
Scott Leibrand wrote: > If you think the IETF should be working > on something other than shim6 or IPv4-style BGP multihoming for IPv6 > (which doesn't require anything new from the IETF), then you'd need to get > enough people to agree with you to hold a BOF and get a new WG started. We need more engineers experimenting with code and less trying to get WG's started. - Kevin