[ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-1: Residential Customer Privacy - Abandoned
Member Services
info at arin.net
Fri Oct 13 14:31:07 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Multihome Pro Con Document
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-2: Micro-allocations for Internal infrastructure - Last Call
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The ARIN Advisory Council (AC), acting under the provisions of the ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process (IRPEP), has reviewed policy proposal 2006-1: Residential Customer Privacy. It has determined that there is no community consensus in favor of the proposal and should thus be abandoned. The AC made this determination at their meeting at the conclusion of the ARIN Public Policy meeting on 12 October 2006. The results of the AC meeting were reported by the Chair of the AC at the member meeting. This report can be found at http://www.arin.net/meetings/minutes/ARIN_XVIII/mem.html In order for this proposal to be further considered the author must use the last call petition process as defined in the ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process. This policy will be considered to be abandoned if the author of the proposal does not initiate a last call petition by 23:59, Eastern Time, 20 October 2006. The current policy proposal text is provided below and is also available http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2006_1.html The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found at http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html. Regards, Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) ##*## Policy Proposal 2006-1: Residential Customer Privacy Policy statement Proposal type: modify (NRPM sections 4.2.3.7.6 and 6.5.5.1) Policy Term: permanent An organization with downstream residential customers may substitute that organization's name for the customer's name, e.g. 'Private customer - XYZ Network', and the customer's entire address may be replaced with 'Private Residence'. Each private downstream residential reassignment must have accurate upstream Abuse and Technical POCs visible on the WHOIS record for that block. NRPM Section 3.2 on Distributed Information Server Use Requirements (from policy proposal 2003-5) is also updated by striking the words "that includes displaying only the city, state, zip code, and country". Policy Rationale This policy allows for a residential customer's entire physical address to be suppressed, not just the street name and number. It also removes the US-centric phrases "state" and "zip code" from the NRPM, reflecting ARIN's broader service area. In many cases, a postal code or even a city name can identify few enough individuals, particularly considering the set of those likely to have their own IP assignments, that the intent of policy proposal 2003-3 is constructively defeated. Timetable for implementation: Immediately upon approval.
- Previous message: [ppml] Multihome Pro Con Document
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-2: Micro-allocations for Internal infrastructure - Last Call
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list