[ppml] Staff Comments Regarding Policy Proposal 2006-3
Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Fri Oct 6 04:01:55 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Staff Comments Regarding Policy Proposal 2006-3
- Next message: [ppml] Staff Comments Regarding Policy Proposal 2006-3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> However, the current ARIN IRR, according to recent messages on the ppml > list, contains information that is pulled in from other IRR sources. > The authenticity of this data can not be verified by ARIN. Sure it can. ARIN is the only one who CAN guarantee its authenticity since ARIN is the one who knows whether the data originated from its delegees or from another IRR. If ARIN adds a data field to all its IRR objects to inform users whether ARIN considers the data to be trustable or not, then ISPs can act accordingly. > For route objects stored in the ARIN IRR, according to information I > was told early this year, ARIN does not presently verify the person > registering the object against POC info in the resource database as > is done for address and AS objects. So ARIN could, but does not, > authenticate this information. ARIN is acting correctly in not authenticating this info because ARIN has no policy that defines the ARIN RIR as a source of trusted data. In the absence of a policy defining the scope of the ARIN IRR, what is the point in worrying about the processes followed internally? --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] Staff Comments Regarding Policy Proposal 2006-3
- Next message: [ppml] Staff Comments Regarding Policy Proposal 2006-3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list