[ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Thu Oct 5 06:14:50 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Comment on "Policy Proposal 2006-1" (Residential Privacy modification)
- Next message: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, I understand that ARIN wants to give out /48s for PI but reserve a / 44. That's a bad idea, see the message below about this that I sent to the RIPE address policy list. Begin forwarded message: > History, both in IPv4 and IPv6, has shown that keeping space in > reserve to accommodate future request doesn't work very well: > people often end up announcing several blocks anyway. So let's not > waste the space and make filtering harder by doing this. Also, > since a /48 is an incredible amount of space to begin with, coming > back for more should be rare in IPv6. > The advantage of only giving out /48s with no unused space between > them is that if, for instance, 12000 /48s are given out, that will > be from a single /34 and allowing /48s from a /34 allows 16384 > routes, while allowing /48s from a /20 (because for every /48 of > 12000 a /32 is kept in reserve) allows 268 million routes, more > than enough to overload any reasonable routing system in an attack.
- Previous message: [ppml] Comment on "Policy Proposal 2006-1" (Residential Privacy modification)
- Next message: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list