[ppml] Opposition to 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
Stacy Taylor
ipgoddess at gmail.com
Tue Oct 3 05:58:53 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Opposition to 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Next message: [ppml] ARIN member in good standing?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi All, I support this proposal. I believe this is an excellent technical reason for a microallocation that does no harm and only good for our networks and customers. Thanks, Stacy On 10/2/06, Jason Schiller <schiller at uu.net> wrote: > I haven't heard a lot of opposition to 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation, > so I would like to invite people to offer any opposing thoughts for > debate. > > Please voice are any new concerns that have not yet been addressed so that > these thoughts can be discussed, and possibly folded into the policy. > > > Thanks, > > ___Jason > > ========================================================================== > Jason Schiller (703)886.6648 > Senior Internet Network Engineer fax:(703)886.0512 > Public IP Global Network Engineering schiller at uu.net > UUNET / Verizon jason.schiller at verizonbusiness.com > > The good news about having an email address that is twice as long is that > it increases traffic on the Internet. > > > _______________________________________________ > PPML mailing list > PPML at arin.net > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml > -- :):) /S
- Previous message: [ppml] Opposition to 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Next message: [ppml] ARIN member in good standing?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list