[ppml] Consensus and voting: a proposal
David Williamson
dlw+arin at tellme.com
Mon Oct 2 10:09:11 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Consensus and voting: a proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Opposition to 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:55:44PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote: > If there is opposition to the proposal, but, none of the opponents > stepped up > to the mic. to explain said opposition, I don't think that means the > opposition > should be disregarded. While I agree with Owen (and others who responded to his message), I do think that something constructive could be done after a straw poll that reveals unexpected opposition. If there's been little debate, but a large fraction of the room votes against a proposal, perhaps some promprting of an explanation would be helpful. Mysterious and gratuitous opposition seems like a difficult stance to understand. On the other hand, this seems to be fairly unusual. I suspect there's no need for any change in actual procedures. -David
- Previous message: [ppml] Consensus and voting: a proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Opposition to 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list