[ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
Pekka Savola
pekkas at netcore.fi
Thu Jun 29 13:58:04 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Next message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Jason Schiller (schiller at uu.net) wrote: > If it is OK to consume one slot (or more) in the global routing table to > make multihoming that that should be equally true if the slot contains > either a PA or a PI prefix. A specific PI block could possibly eliminate that "(or more)" part, which might be a good thing. There is ample evidence of both ISPs and sites leaking out a lot of more specifics, either intentionally or not. If we go for a routing based solution (which I'm opposed to), at least it should be one that doesn't allow littering the DFZ with all kinds of junk. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
- Previous message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Next message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list