[ppml] 2005-1 status

[Daniel Golding]

On 1/30/06 4:49 PM, "Steve Feldman" <steven.feldman at cnet.com> wrote:

>> It is conceivable
>> that each franchise would be responsible for getting internet
>> service on
>> their own.  In that case you would have a /48 per restaurant.
> 
> But would all these restaurants want to multihome?
> I'm guessing not...
> 
> Perhaps the policy should be written to explicitly only count
> multihomed locations when determining the assignment size?
> Steve
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml

In real life, they would use two subnets be restaurant (maybe 3) - one for
manager workstation, one for process control, and another as the "/30" for
the WAN link. 

BTW, is the idea to waste /64s for WAN links, or am I missing something?

- Dan