ARIN-PPML Message

[ppml] What is this world coming to?

> I think that ignoring the content of the policy for the 
> sake of interpreting
> its intent is not a precedent I would like to see set here.  Whether 
> you like the result
> or not, the granularity of a Postal or ZIP code is not sufficient to 
> meet the tests
> for exclusion described by the board on adoption of the policy.

That statement is sufficient to meet my tests for 
mindless bureaucracy.

>  As 
> such, the simple
> and correct way to get what you want is to propose a policy which 
> amends this
> section of the NRPM to say what you actually want it to say.

So now there is a correct way to discuss policy problems?
Please tell me more. I was labouring under the delusion
that the PPML was an open list for discussion of ARIN
policies. In other words, a list for anyone to use, regardless
of whether or not they meet your tests for correctness.

--Michael Dillon