[ppml] Proposed Policy: MicroAllocations for Internal Infrastructure
Thanks for your comments.
I totally agree that section 4 should only be about IPv4 and secetion 6
should only be about IPv6.
Point well taken.
Jason Schiller (703)886.6648
Senior Internet Network Engineer fax:(703)886.0512
Public IP Global Network Engineering schiller at uu.net
UUNET / Verizon jason.schiller at verizonbusiness.com
The good news about having an email address that is twice as long is that
it increases traffic on the Internet.
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:14:54 -0500 (EST)
> From: Scott Leibrand <sleibrand at internap.com>
> To: Member Services <memsvcs at arin.net>
> Cc: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ppml] Proposed Policy: MicroAllocations for Internal
> This seems like a reasonable IPv6 MicroAllocation policy. If we're going
> to replace the "/24 using IPv4 or a /48 using IPv6" language of section
> 6.10 with the text below, IMO we should also modify section 4.4 to remove
> the "/48 using IPv6" language and instead refer users to 6.10 for the IPv6
> MicroAllocation policy.
> Aside from that quibble, I currently support the policy proposal as