[ppml] Version think... was: alternative to 2005-1
As much as I'd like to join you guys in suggesting that
we just pass something no matter how bad it is... I can't.
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> On 02/13/06 at 3:18pm -0000, Paul Vixie <paul at vix.com> wrote:
>> and that the only real effect of 2005-1 will be to end the complaints
>> about how broken IPv6 is and how PI space is needed. but, let's find
> Yes, let's. I really think we should pass some sort of IPv6 PI policy at
> Montreal. If limiting the number of PI allocations allowed under the
> policy makes that possible by making the policy more palatable to a wider
> audience, I'm all for it. I just want to make sure that we don't set the
> limit too low.
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net