[ppml] question on 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
Martin Hannigan
hannigan at renesys.com
Tue Aug 29 18:27:44 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] question on 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Next message: [ppml] question on 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 06:19 PM 8/29/2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: >On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 06:10:13PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote: > > At 12:05 PM 8/29/2006, Kevin Loch wrote: > > >Martin Hannigan wrote: > > > > Here are the members, for the most part, of the DFZ > > > > (as compiled today): > > > > > >I always interpreted DFZ as "default free", not "transit free". > > >Is this usage common? > > > > transit-free. > >Default-free means quite simply, you don't have a default route, aka you >carry a complete view of the global Internet routing table to make your >routing decisions. Really it has nothing to do with being transit-free, >nor does being transit-free have anything to do with whether a route is >announced in the global table. At any rate, FYI in the previous list >Teleglobe is not transit-free (which, btw is not the same thing as >SETTLEMENT free :P), they receive a full transit feed from 1239 as >verifiable through their looking glass. If you really care, you can start >by looking at the Wikipedia article on "Tier 1 network" (which *gasp* is >actually correct at the moment :P) for a verified list of settlement and >transit free networks (aka Tier 1's :P), but again, this has nothing to do >with anything. Let's be clear on a few things. Yes, I don't disagree on DFZ. There's a bit if dyslexia in there. The second is that we aren't claiming anyone is settlement free, but as you can imagine from a our ranking, going from 1 to Nth is settlement free. They are publicly available here: http://www.renesys.com/products_services/market_intel/rankings/ >Personally I think if you can't just say "Global Internet Routing Table" >and have a complete and air-tight understanding of what is being >referenced, we've got bigger problems. :) I agree. Posting for the sake of posting is one of them. :) -- Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663 Renesys Corporation (w) 617-395-8574 Member of Technical Staff Network Operations hannigan at renesys.com
- Previous message: [ppml] question on 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Next message: [ppml] question on 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list