[ppml] question on 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Mon Aug 21 18:11:09 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] question on 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Next message: [ppml] question on 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:36:53PM -0400, Azinger, Marla wrote: > Jason, or whomever may know the answer to these quesions. > > 1. Does anyone know if this is an ISP and Network Provider wide problem? Or is it more specific to certain ISP's or Networks that set their network up a certain way, or with a specific set of vendor equipment? > > 2. I assume since this isnt offered as a solution it wont work, but could someone briefly explain why "V6 Private Space" wont work for this. And when I say V6 private space I mean using the Site Local configuration/ address format. well that might be tough, since site-local has been depricated, however, sites can use ULA prefixes w/o fear, since the IETF has carved out some unicast space as a free-for-all space... no RIR involvement is possible. Just carve out what you want/need and go with it!!! --bill > > Thank you for the clarification > Marla > Frontier Communications > _______________________________________________ > PPML mailing list > PPML at arin.net > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
- Previous message: [ppml] question on 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Next message: [ppml] question on 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list