[ppml] Policy Proposal 2005-8: Proposal to amend ARIN IPv6 assignment and utilisation requirement - Last Call

Lea Roberts lea.roberts at stanford.edu
Tue Apr 18 15:24:11 EDT 2006


hi Izumi!

thanks for the clarification(s).  I still have a question below.

On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Izumi Okutani wrote:

<snip>

> The current issues in JP are two:
>
>  + Some impact over the existing LIRs are noted, expecially in
>    terms of expenses(1/2 LIRs face additional expenses of over
>    US$85,000).

are these additional expenses one time costs?  or do people feel there is
some ongoing cost to dealing with multiple assignment sizes even after
the supporting software is upgraded?

>  + Few LIRs LIRs expressed concerns that classless addressing will
>    lose the benefit of IPv6 over IPv4.
>    i.e, simplicity of network design and service specification
>

<snip>
				thanks again,   /Lea




More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list