[ppml] Policy Proposal 2005-1: Provider-independent IPv6 Assignments for End Sites - Last Call

[Edward Lewis]

At 23:09 -0700 4/17/06, Owen DeLong wrote:

>You have the names correct. You are saying you swung from 2006-4
>to 2005-1.  FWIW, 2005-1 is the one moving to last call.

I'm glad I used the names then, I had the policy identifiers 
reversed.  So, yeah, I'm for the one that made it to last call.

>OTOH, someone who qualifies for V4 can easily get the V4 assignment,
>then, roll that up in to a V6 assignment and all that requirement
>really accomplishes is to unnecessarily increase the consumption of
>V4 address space (IMHO).

Yeah, the difference between "doing" and "qualifying for" is not 
great.  It's just that having overcome the inertia of not doing it 
means you are relatively more, umm, worthy.

As the two choices were that close, something so slight is all it 
took to sway me between the two.
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar

Nothin' more exciting than going to the printer to watch the toner drain...