[ppml] PI policy discussion
I would be happy to work on a proposal.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Leibrand [mailto:sleibrand at internap.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 12:45 PM
> To: Tony Hain
> Cc: ppml at arin.net; Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
> Subject: Re: [ppml] PI policy discussion
> I've been waiting for the existing PI policies to get the go-ahead nod
> before raising this, but now that that seems to have happened, I was
> wondering if you, Michael, and anyone else who's interested would like to
> work with me to try putting together a policy proposal to address this.
> Specifically, I'd like such a proposal to be relatively simple, but define
> a way for ARIN to choose PI networks to ease future aggregation.
> Would you be interested in doing so at this stage?
> On 04/10/06 at 12:33pm -0700, Tony Hain <alh-ietf at tndh.net> wrote:
> > The primary objection to PI appears to be the presumption of long term
> > deaggregation. If the space used for PI assignments has structure it is
> > conceivable that service providers not directly involved at a level of
> > structure could ignore the detail through aggregation. This requires a
> > little forethought in terms of laying out space. It doesn't require that
> > do anything long term, it just creates the potential to mitigate the
> > about perpetual deaggregates.
> > Tony
> > _______________________________________________
> > PPML mailing list
> > PPML at arin.net
> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml