[ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-4: IPv6 Direct PI Assignments for End Sites - revised text

[billd at cait.wustl.edu]

So an organization that receives a PI assignment from ARIN is NOT and
end-site....
As such, the policy proposal 2006-4 as written there is NO chance for an
organization to qualify....as #2 and #4 are mutually exclusive....?

1. not be an LIR;
2. be an end site;
3. be currently multihomed using IPv4;
4. have a direct assignment from ARIN of at least a IPv4 /19 and can show
the current utilization of 80% of an IPv4 /19 equivalent.

Bill Darte




> -----Original Message-----
> From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On 
> Behalf Of Howard, W. Lee
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 8:49 AM
> To: Marshall Eubanks; Andrew Dul
> Cc: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-4: IPv6 Direct PI 
> Assignments forEnd Sites - revised text
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
> > Behalf Of Marshall Eubanks
> > Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 8:34 PM
> > To: Andrew Dul
> > Cc: ppml at arin.net
> > Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-4: IPv6 Direct PI 
> > Assignments forEnd Sites - revised text
> > 
> > Dear Andrew;
> > 
> > A question : it says
> > 
> >       6.5.8.1. To qualify for a direct end site assignment, an 
> > organization must meet all of the following criteria:
> > 
> > <snip>
> >           2. be an end site;
> > <snip>
> > 
> > Is "end site" clearly defined somewhere ?
> 
> http://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six29
> 
> 6.2.9. End site
> An end site is defined as an end user (subscriber) who has a 
> business relationship with a service provider that involves:
> 
> that service provider assigning address space to the end user 
> that service provider providing transit service for the end 
> user to other sites 
> that service provider carrying the end user's traffic. 
> that service provider advertising an aggregate prefix route 
> that contains the end user's assignment 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > A large (or even not so large) corporation may well act as a transit
> > provider to remote corporate locations;
> > I would argue that the entire entity is a end site, no matter how  
> > distributed, but I just wanted to make
> > this clear.
> 
> An end site is an organization that gets assignments and transit 
> from an upstream.  Under this definition, if an organization 
> gets an (unaggregatable) PI assignment, it is not an end 
> site.  A remote office could be considered to be an end site.
> 
> Lee
> 
> 
> > 
> > Regards
> > Marshall Eubanks
> > 
> > On Apr 3, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Andrew Dul wrote:
> > 
> > >>  -------Original Message-------
> > >>  From: Scott Leibrand <sleibrand at internap.com>
> > >>  Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-4: IPv6 Direct PI
> > >> Assignments for End Sites - revised text
> > >>  Sent: 03 Apr '06 15:37
> > >>
> > >>  Andrew,
> > >>
> > >>  This text doesn't seem to match my reading of your proposed
> > >> revisions from
> > >>  your recent message(s).  Can you give us a diff of the 
> changes and
> > >>  rationale for them?
> > >
> > > I added the text to allow a /48 per ASN.  The text is different
> > > than what was originally posted on the list last week.  
> Thanks to  
> > > those in the background who helped cleanup the text.  The 
> > intent of
> > > what I proposed last week is unchanged.
> > >
> > > The reserved /44 remains unchanged.  There didn't seem to be any
> > > vocal support for a larger (/40) reserved block.
> > >
> > > Andrew
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > PPML mailing list
> > > PPML at arin.net
> > > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > PPML mailing list
> > PPML at arin.net
> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
>