[ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor
On 30-Oct-2005, at 10:16 , Kevin Loch wrote:
> Here's the policy I see condensing out of this:
> To qualify for a minimum end site assignment of /44 you must
> - have an allocation or assignment directly from ARIN (and not a
> legacy allocation or assignment)
> - meet the qualifications for an IPv4 assignment from ARIN without
> actually requesting one.
I like the idea of directly linking PI v6 assignments to some
corresponding minimum size of v4 assignment. I think that approach
has the potential to allow larger organizations to be early adopters
while still limiting the number of assignments to prevent a run.
Long term we will eventually have to find a better metric, but for
the foreseeable future I don't think it's likely to expect anyone in
the ARIN region to be deploying v6-only networks.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part