> >> I would expect all those who didn't support the policy on the grounds of
> >> routing/FIB table growth also to object to the original 2005-1 text.
> > And is that a non-zero set?
> it is a non-null set
Uh, right, I've heard that asserted twice, now, but no such people have
yet manifested from the woodwork. Care to find one for us?
-Bill