[ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Lea Roberts wrote:
> > So my question was whether there's anyone who, having seen the much
> > nastier alternative, doesn't now support the original 2005-1?
> I understand that it would be really nice if we could really reach
> consensus to not care about the size of the IPv6 routing table, but that
> wasn't the reality I experienced in Orlando. Routing table size was
> a major concern sited by those whose indicated opposition to the
> original 2005-1.
Right, but that wasn't my question. I know there were people who were
worried about that in Orlando. My question is whether they're still
concerned about it, _now_ that they've seen the alternative.
Which you haven't answered... You've said what you thought then. What do
you think _now_, and why?
> I hope this will help others (and maybe even you) to understand how the
> extra stuff got piled on.
Really no concern. Spilt milk. Water under the bridge. No sweat. I'm
not worried about history, I'm interested in the future.