[ppml] tying back to 2005-1

[Leo Bicknell]

In a message written on Fri, May 20, 2005 at 01:56:18PM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote:
> I'm assuming that the mega-thread "IPv6>>32" and it's threadlets are 
> related to the proposed policy 2005-1.

As the original poster of "IPv6>>32", my straw man proposal had
nothing specifically to do with 2005-1.  I do think some of the
sub-threads wandered into that area though.

As I see it, there are several interdependent issues to discuss:

- Is a /64 of "host space" a good idea.  (IPv6>>32)
- What is the proper measure of utilization.  [Straight percentage,
  HD Ratio, with either, what is the choice of threshold.]
- Should IPv6 space be made available to non-ISP's? (2005-1)
- Should IPv6 space be made available to non-Internet networks?

Unfortunately, they are very much linked in important ways, where
a change in one area can cause huge consequences in another.
Complicate that with the current lack of operational experience at
all levels and it's extremely difficult to reach a consensus.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20050520/83b6058a/attachment.sig>