[arin-discuss] ipv6 fees in new fee structure

[Jawaid Bazyar]

I appear to have misinterpreted prior comments, and I appear to have 
violated one of my own rules: don't post to a forum on less than 6 hours 
sleep.

Apologies!

On 03/07/2013 03:26 PM, John Curran wrote:
> Jawaid -
>
>    The ability for providers to get a smaller block (e.g. /36) happened
>    more than a year ago (via implementation of Draft Policy ARIN-2011-3)
>    and is independent of the revised fee schedule.
>
>    The revised fee schedule for someone with /32 of IPv6 is actually lower
>    under the new fees ($2000/year vs $2250), or it would be if not for the
>    fact that the prior $2250 annual fee has benefitted from 25% discount
>    that has been effect for several years (i.e., net result was $1688/yr).
>
>    The revised fee schedule does result in some members seeing higher fees,
>    but it results in lower fees for the majority and _consistent_ fees for
>    everyone.  A presentation to the members covering this in detail was
>    made at the last member's meeting and is available here:
>    <https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_XXX/PDF/thursday/curran_fee_schedule.pdf>
>
> Thanks!
> /John
>
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN
>
>
>     

-- 

Jawaid Bazyar

President

ph 303.815.1814

fax 303.815.1001

Jawaid.Bazyar at foreThought.net <email:Jawaid.Bazyar at foreThought.net>
	<http://www.foreThought.net>
Note our new address: 2347 Curtis St, Denver CO 80205