[arin-discuss] Size Categories for IPv6.

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Mon Apr 18 16:35:32 EDT 2011


Andrew,

First, end sites receive assignments and not allocations.

Second, there are size categories for end sites:

From: https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html

IPV6 END USER FEES
Size Category	Fee (US Dollars)	Block Size
X-small	$1,250	smaller than /40
Small	$2,250	/40 to /32
Medium	$4,500	/31 to /30
Large	$9,000	/29 to /27
X-large	$18,000	/26 to /22
XX-large	$36,000	/22 and larger


As you can see, your multiple /48s (up to 255 of them) can be issued together for a single
X-Small fee of $1,250.

Further, these are one-time fees when blocks are issued and your annual fee is $100.

The fees listed in the ISP table are annual subscription fees. Do you really want your end-user
fees increased that extensively?

Owen

On Apr 18, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Andrew Gallo wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I would agree this topic needs further discussion and hopefully policy
> improvement and implementation.
> 
> These size assignments should not be just for ISPs.  As an end site
> that, for various reasons, should have larger than a /48, we seem to be
> stuck with either multiple /48 allocations, or attempting to justify a
> /32.  Ideally, there would be size categories between 48 & 32,
> especially for end sites that receive allocations directly from ARIN.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/18/2011 3:54 PM, cja at daydream.com wrote:
>> There was a recent policy proposal (138) to try to change the size
>> categories for IPv6 allocations.  It was abandoned by the AC because it is a
>> pricing matter but I wanted to start up a discussion here to perhaps give
>> ARIN guidance as to how the community feels about changing the sizes.
>> 
>> Currently the IPv6 size categories are
>> 
>> IPv6 Annual FeeS (NOTE: FEE WAIVERS IN EFFECT)Size CategoryFee (US
>> Dollars)Block
>> SizeX-small$1,250smaller than /40Small$2,250/40 to /32Medium$4,500/31 to /30
>> Large$9,000/29 to /27X-large$18,000/26 to /22XX-large$36,000/22 and largerThe
>> proposal was to change them as follows
>> 
>> X-small /32 or smaller
>> Small /31 to /30
>> Medium /29 to /27
>> Large /26 to /24
>> X-large /23 to /20
>> XX-large /20 and larger
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> ----Cathy
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ARIN-Discuss
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> 
> - -- 
> ____________
> Andrew Gallo
> The George Washington University
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAk2smHYACgkQQr/gMVyFYyTFXwCfdYagWQ9x+woozic6g5zJcprN
> dScAn2pEjJuHBtTDHqmI43Zaoo+KrXjq
> =c0cf
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-Discuss
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/attachments/20110418/79bd1053/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-discuss mailing list