[arin-discuss] Size Categories for IPv6.

[Brian. Hierholzer]

How do I get off list?

Sent from my mobile phone

On Apr 18, 2011, at 3:15 PM, "James Cornick - JCHost.net<http://JCHost.net>" <james.cornick at jchost.net<mailto:james.cornick at jchost.net>> wrote:

I agree there needs to be an equivalent for the X-Small allocation with ipv4 in conjunture with ipv6 fee schedule and allocation size.  I believe this will encourage ipv6 use as it will not be as costly and also so everyone who has ipv4 allocation would have the ability to easily obtain a ipv6 allocation.  In terms of what you have laid out allocation size wise I think what you have makes good sense unless there is a way to make the /32 the x-small, however making the /32 the x-small seems like there would be a lot of waste.

Thank you,

James Cornick


On 4/18/2011 3:00 PM, <mailto:cja at daydream.com> cja at daydream.com<mailto:cja at daydream.com> wrote:
How do you feel about the size categories all together?  Do you think they still make sense in IPv6?

Thanks !

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Brian Jankovich <<mailto:bjankovich at vaultnetworks.com>bjankovich at vaultnetworks.com<mailto:bjankovich at vaultnetworks.com>> wrote:
I agree with the proposed pricing mode. Being that the /32 is the smallest a provider can get, it should be in the X-small category.

Brian Jankovich
Vault Networks Hosting Services
http://www.vaultnetworks.com<http://www.vaultnetworks.com/>

Direct: 305.735.8098<tel:305.735.8098> x210
Fax: 708.575.4280<tel:708.575.4280>
Skype: brianvaultnet

From: <mailto:cja at daydream.com> cja at daydream.com<mailto:cja at daydream.com> [mailto:<mailto:packetgrrl at gmail.com>packetgrrl at gmail.com<mailto:packetgrrl at gmail.com>]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 3:54 PM
To: <mailto:arin-discuss at arin.net> arin-discuss at arin.net<mailto:arin-discuss at arin.net>
Subject: [arin-discuss] Size Categories for IPv6.

There was a recent policy proposal (138) to try to change the size categories for IPv6 allocations.  It was abandoned by the AC because it is a pricing matter but I wanted to start up a discussion here to perhaps give ARIN guidance as to how the community feels about changing the sizes.

Currently the IPv6 size categories are

Size Category

Fee (US Dollars)

Block Size

X-small

$1,250

smaller than /40

Small

$2,250

/40 to /32

Medium

$4,500

/31 to /30

Large

$9,000

/29 to /27

X-large

$18,000

/26 to /22

XX-large

$36,000

/22 and larger

IPv6 Annual FeeS (NOTE: FEE WAIVERS IN EFFECT)

The proposal was to change them as follows


X-small    /32 or smaller
Small      /31 to /30
Medium     /29 to /27
Large      /26 to /24
X-large    /23 to /20
XX-large          /20 and larger

Thanks!
----Cathy



_______________________________________________
ARIN-Discuss
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (<mailto:ARIN-discuss at arin.net>ARIN-discuss at arin.net<mailto:ARIN-discuss at arin.net>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
<http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss>http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
Please contact <mailto:info at arin.net> info at arin.net<mailto:info at arin.net> if you experience any issues.

_______________________________________________
ARIN-Discuss
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net<mailto:ARIN-discuss at arin.net>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
Please contact info at arin.net<mailto:info at arin.net> if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/attachments/20110418/947ce614/attachment.html>