[arin-discuss] Size Categories for IPv6.

[Brian Jankovich]

I agree with the proposed pricing mode. Being that the /32 is the smallest a
provider can get, it should be in the X-small category.

 

Brian Jankovich

Vault Networks Hosting Services

 <http://www.vaultnetworks.com/> http://www.vaultnetworks.com

 

Direct: 305.735.8098 x210

Fax: 708.575.4280

Skype: brianvaultnet

 

From: cja at daydream.com [mailto:packetgrrl at gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 3:54 PM
To: arin-discuss at arin.net
Subject: [arin-discuss] Size Categories for IPv6.

 

There was a recent policy proposal (138) to try to change the size
categories for IPv6 allocations.  It was abandoned by the AC because it is a
pricing matter but I wanted to start up a discussion here to perhaps give
ARIN guidance as to how the community feels about changing the sizes.  

 

Currently the IPv6 size categories are

 


Size Category

Fee (US Dollars)

Block Size


X-small

$1,250

smaller than /40


Small

$2,250

/40 to /32


Medium

$4,500

/31 to /30


Large

$9,000

/29 to /27


X-large

$18,000

/26 to /22


XX-large

$36,000

/22 and larger


IPv6 Annual FeeS (NOTE: FEE WAIVERS IN EFFECT)

The proposal was to change them as follows





X-small    /32 or smaller

Small      /31 to /30

Medium     /29 to /27

Large      /26 to /24

X-large    /23 to /20

XX-large          /20 and larger

 

Thanks!

----Cathy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/attachments/20110418/e561b5ab/attachment.html>