[arin-discuss] Status of Investigations

[Ted Mittelstaedt]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net
>[mailto:arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of Dean Anderson
>Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 9:21 AM
>To: Michael Smith
>Cc: arin-discuss at arin.net
>Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] Status of Investigations
>
>
>[ARIN agrees that discussion to recall Board members, to conduct
>investigations of ARIN expenditures, and to stop certain ARIN
>expenditures does not violate the ARIN AUP.]
>
>
>I have to say this one more time:
>
>Michael Smith does not have anything to do with my legal counsel, nor
>anything to do with what topics or terms my counsel has approved.
>

No, but how interesting that so many people echo Michael's viewpoints.

>The preface to my message is not a "discovery preamble". Indeed there is
>no such term as "discovery preamble" in Black's Law Dictionary.

I agree.  In fact, since as you point out, the discussion is useless
for whatever lawsuit you keep threatening your going to file one of
these days, I would go so far as to argue the entire discussion is a
pointless waste of time.  That is in fact, which is why I stopped
participating when it became obvious at how pointless it is.  I figured
it would die off as of it's own accord.

But, I also agree that it's not fair to continually call for "banning"
this discussion as some keep doing.  So, please, if your a reader still
reading this who feels the urge to comment, please do so - it furnishes
a great source of amusement.

Ted