[arin-discuss] Status of Investigations

Dean Anderson wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, Jay Hennigan wrote:
> 
>> Dean Anderson wrote:

>>> Are you asserting Exactis' attorney committed some violation of
>>> professional conduct? 
>> Not at all, merely that he was employed specifically to argue against 
>> MAPS and Vixie, and not an impartial observer.
> 
> Good. Then we can agree that the statements in the pleadings and
> memoranda I cited are true.

Not at all, not even close.  We can speculate that Exactis made certain 
assertions to its attorney, and the attorney believed at the time that 
the assertions were true.  The possibility that the attorney indeed 
committed some violation of professional conduct can't be ruled out.

For us to believe that the statements are true based on the above is 
ludicrous.  For the attorney to avoid professional misconduct, he would 
have to believe that they were true at the time, regardless of whether 
they were in fact true.

-- 
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay at impulse.net
Impulse Internet Service  -  http://www.impulse.net/
Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV