[arin-discuss] [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
Dean Anderson
dean at av8.net
Wed Oct 10 20:14:55 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [arin-discuss] [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Next message: [arin-discuss] [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: > > > > RADB is a Merit project. > > > > > > The budget line item says "Merit/NANOG Meeting Support" > > > http://www.arin.net/about_us/corp_docs/budget.html > > > > Merit and Nanog are separate entities. Which one was supported? > > > > --Dean > > > I think the syntax is valid, even today. If you look at: > > http://www.nanog.org/charter.html > > the relationship between NANOG and Merit is clearly defined. It is quite clearly defined. Nanog is a corporation, and Merit is a different corporation. They are separate organizations with separate bank accounts and separate projects. Indeed some Merit employees work part time for Nanog. That doesn't make them the same. At most, that just makes Merit a contributor to Nanog, and maybe not even a contributor depending on staff arrangements. RADB is a Merit project that is separate from Nanog. Likewise, The LPF is separate from MIT. FSF is separate from MIT. However, Richard Stallman is employed by MIT. That fact doesn't make either LPF or FSF a part of MIT. If you mean to support the MIT Computer Science and AI Lab, and you send the funds to the LPF, it would be a mistake that should be corrected --Dean -- Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service? www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service 617 344 9000
- Previous message: [arin-discuss] [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Next message: [arin-discuss] [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ARIN-discuss mailing list