[arin-discuss] [ppml] Counsel statementon Legacy assignments?(fwd)

It would seem to me that the fee should be based on a per-IP number
basis.  Why should some company that has many, many times my allocation
pay less than twice as much as I do per year?  

I think the argument that what you are really paying for is registration
service is specious.... what am I paying for in a year in which I don't
require any registration services?  I've been in the ISP business now
for 14 years and I think I've gone through approximately 5 allocations
in that time... most years I don't need any registration service at all.


Why, during those years when I don't need more IP space, is my fee
higher than someone else who actually did go through a registration
process in that year... just because my existing blocks are bigger?

It would seem that existing policy is that you do pay on a per-IP basis
up to a certain point (/14 in IPv4), and then it's all you can eat.  

I think the policy should be:

The Yearly cost of maintaining an allocation should equal Arin's total
annual costs divided by the total number of IP numbers allocated times
the total number of IPs being used by the member.  

Right now, as your allocations get larger, you have less and less of an
incentive to worry about whether or not you are wasting IP space.  A per
IP number fee policy would align the community's interests (i.e.
conservation of IP space) with the financial interests of the members
using the space.  Right now IP space is effectively a "commons" and we
are seeing the "tragedy of the commons".  


Onramp Access
chad kissinger  |  president  |  onramp access, inc. 
p: 512.322.9200  |  f: 512.476.2878  |  www.onr.com
your internet operations  |  built  |  deployed  |  managed

-----Original Message-----
From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net
[mailto:arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Kirk Ismay
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 12:11 PM
To: arin-discuss at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] [ppml] Counsel statementon Legacy
assignments?(fwd)


>
> I'd prefer that the communities' energies (and ARIN's) go to promoting

> IPv6 traction rather than scraping the bottom of the IPv4 barrel, 
> especially when we don't _really_ know what's down there.
>
>   
I agree with focusing on the future.

-- 

Sincerely, 
Kirk Ismay
System Administrator

--
Net Idea
201-625 Front Street Nelson, BC V1L 4B6
P:250-352-3512 | F:250-352-9780 | TF:1-888-352-3512

Check out our brand new website! www.netidea.com

_______________________________________________
ARIN-Discuss
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN
Discussion
Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss Please contact the
ARIN Member
Services Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.