[arin-discuss] [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacyassignments?(fwd)
Jeremy Anthony Kinsey
jer at mia.net
Fri Oct 5 13:01:59 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [arin-discuss] [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacyassignments?(fwd)
- Next message: [arin-discuss] SPAM-WARN:Re: [ppml] Counsel statement onLegacyassignments?(fwd)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Oct 5, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: >> For example, if we were able to extend our block, (assuming no one is >> above us or below us) we would easily pay less than if we just bought >> another /20. I think the fee structure charges more to increase >> your allocation, when you cannot increase the netblock you are in >> because, again, someone is in the space below you, or above you. >> > This is not true. The cost of two separate /20s is the same as a /19 > under the ISP rules. The prices are based on the aggregate sum of > all your address spaces, not each individual allocation (assuming all > allocations are under the same ORG). > > If you have two /20s, then, for billing purposes, you are a /19 and > you > would pay the /19 price. Insert foot in mouth.. Thank you for the clarification.. So in other words, I could go from a /20 to a /19 and still pay what I am currently paying? Great, how do I begin that process? I am out of space. > >> I'd like to be able to increase to say, a /19 from a /20 and pay >> the / >> 19 price, but I cannot do that.. Does that make sense? It would be >> nice if there were some way to increase our network allocation, >> outside of our own allocation but still pay the same rate based on >> the TOTAL allocation... If that makes sense.. >> > That is exactly how it works. Great.. Thank you. > >> Also, from a cash flow perspective, I would rather pay MONTHLY, than >> annually.. It would make it much easier for us and other ISP's from a >> cash flow perspective to charge out our IP services on monthly >> basis. We could then better justify buying a larger allocation, and >> in the long run, save money, but buying more for less. > > You are not BUYING an allocation. You are paying for a registration > service. In terms of managing the cash flow, get a small loan to pay > your ARIN fees and then make monthly payments on the loan and > you have the same cash flow. I don't think that I want to see the very > small staff at ARIN tied up managing monthly instead of annual > bills or a mixture of customers who prefer different billing cycles. The annual is not killing me.. Getting a loan would be stupid for such an amount.. What I am getting at is I run my business on 30 day payables... I know of no other service that requires an annual, upfront payment for services. Imagine if I had to pay for my fiber annually... OUCH!!! > > Would you want to pay for the additional headcount at ARIN to support > such a thing in order to get monthly bills? > > I really do not think it could cost that much to maintaining accounting of money coming in.. ;-) Thanks again for the input and clarification! Regards, Jeremy Anthony Kinsey e-mail: jer at mia.net _____________________________________ Bella Mia, Inc. www.mia.net 401 Host Drive www.dslone.com Lake Geneva, WI. 53147 www.hostdrive.com Phone: (262)248-6759 www.bella-mia.com Fax: (262)248-6959 www.thednsplace.com
- Previous message: [arin-discuss] [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacyassignments?(fwd)
- Next message: [arin-discuss] SPAM-WARN:Re: [ppml] Counsel statement onLegacyassignments?(fwd)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ARIN-discuss mailing list