[arin-discuss] Privacy of Reassignment Information
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Fri Apr 7 23:55:54 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [arin-discuss] Privacy of Reassignment Information
- Next message: [arin-discuss] Privacy of Reassignment Information
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
--On April 7, 2006 10:25:11 PM -0400 "Divins, David" <dsd at servervault.com> wrote: > All, > > Provided an ISP, or other direct assignment recipient, supplies valid > and responsive (24x7) Abuse, NOC, and other pertinent contact > information, a reassignment should be allowed to remain private. > First, a direct assignment recipient cannot reassign, so, this would not apply to a direct assignment recipient. Second, the policy was abandoned fairly recently due to lack of support by the community and lack of consensus to move forward. IP resources are an element of public trust. It is common and widespread practice to disclose as a matter of public record possessory interest in public resources. The public interest in an open and equitable system of resource assignments and allocations overrides ISPs interest in hiding the identities of their customers. > The ability for an ISP to selectively and voluntarily make an assignment > private will still allow ARIN to have accurate reassignment information > as the assignments will be provided to ARIN privately whenever address > utilization must be determined. > ARIN is a stewardship organization. The IP addresses are no more owned by ARIN than by any recipient organization. They are administered by ARIN and the ISPs in the public trust. They are public resources. > The private designation in no way relieves the ISP of its responsibility > to the Internet community. In fact, a private reassignment expands this > responsibility as the ISP actually must take on the responsibility > providing valid 24x7 point of contact. > The community vehemently opposed adding such a requirement to the previous attempt at such a policy. > If an ISP is unable or unwilling to provide a responsive NOC/abuse > contact, then they may not designate any reassignments as private. > How would you propose to prevent ISPs from ignoring this requirement? Owen -- If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/attachments/20060407/4df41356/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [arin-discuss] Privacy of Reassignment Information
- Next message: [arin-discuss] Privacy of Reassignment Information
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ARIN-discuss mailing list