consistancy

>   I dont' think anyone is accusing any party of being frivolous or
> arbitrary. 

Read my post again.  You have misunderstood it.


>   My point, however, was that you can no more isolate the perception of
> imbalance from the new policy than you can the need for conservation from
> the recognition that there are vast unused address blocks. And like it or

To say that one issue does not impact, directly or indirectly, the other
issue would be incorrect.  

I really can't determine which post you are replying to since it does not
address the one that I wrote.