consistancy
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Sat Sep 16 15:29:04 EDT 2000
- Previous message: consistancy
- Next message: consistancy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > Bill et al. > > Why not just up the anti a notch and require that all legacy address > space have working in-addr records by January 1, 2001 or that space shall > be deemed inactive and returned to the public pool. Its not quite that easy. Stanford refused transfers as does MIT (to pick on Universities), making it hard to verify. > > IANA can delegate enforcement to the registries using the address as registered. > i.e. If the address is in the ARIN region, ARIN enforces the deallocation. IANA might do many things. They have had a tough time ramping up and may not be ready to take this on quite yet. Something to do w/ recent activities on the Open Membership front and a change in board membership seems to be taking some time. Still, given the current nature of ICANN, I expect that the only inputs they will take are from the RIRs themselves. Since these are legecy delegations, I suspect that forcing folks to a predetermined registry might open the discussion space, esp. since all registries are now charging fees. I expect that the legecy delegates are going to be screwed since they were never part of the RIR process and ICANN via the ASO agreements excludes these folks. > Due to the history of the Internet this is primarily a North American issue. Not really. There is significant European presence. > Small organizations requiring multi-homing could then hopefully get space from > the legacy "swamp" allocations retrieved from this effort. Two key words here. "Hopefully" and a buck will get you coffee at Starbucks. "Swamp" - based on previous reclaimation data and the dns delegation data <www.isi.edu/~bmanning/in-addr-audit.html> the "swamp" is in the 207 and 209 prefix range. Most small route injections are coming from those ranges. > I suspect large portions of the early allocations belong to defunct organizations > or have been forgotten by the rightful owners. Not really. The hardest part has been the egregious update policies in getting whois data updates. --bill
- Previous message: consistancy
- Next message: consistancy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ARIN-discuss mailing list