guideline for name-based web hosting justification
PSchroebel
paschroebel at erols.com
Wed Sep 13 17:42:53 EDT 2000
- Previous message: guideline for name-based web hosting justification
- Next message: guideline for name-based web hosting justification
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lets Not get the NAT's in the www servers....please. What if? We look at this for a moment use the : NIC Mac's for the allocation of IP numbers where SSL's and apps require IP space. Here a machine that can handle numerous NIC could use multiple IP's and be quite useful and it does work well. There is a trick to making NT work with multi NIC's but it works. If you are hosting with merchants that require SSL's you co-locate them and rack them up or put them on the multi-nic machines. Free webhosting with IP's must go but that's my opinion any how. Free virtual hosting is just fine! We have limited resources IP wise and IPV6 is not there yet.. and who knows where we will be in a year or so. Remember that the NAT saved us from the last IP crunch. Just a thought.. :) Peter Schroebel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mury" <mury at goldengate.net> To: "David W. Hankins" <dhankins at mfnx.net> Cc: "Mike Horwath" <drechsau at geeks.org>; "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp at hilander.com>; "Matt Bailey" <mbailey at journey.net>; <arin-discuss at arin.net>; <ppml at arin.net> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 4:04 PM Subject: Re: guideline for name-based web hosting justification > > It's just plain stupid to go around spouting that name based hosting is as > > easy to accomplish (full scale) as it is to give a dialup user a dynamic > > IP or have lots of your users use NAT. > > I have to admit, that the metaphor does hold in my view if you are speaking > in terms of difficulty. The only difference in difficulty I see is in > introducing billing mechanisms that are obviously vacant in the case of > dial access systems. What about all the other issues people have raised? QOS, black-holed IPs, HTTP/1.0 (which seems to be minimal, but from more digging on my own it could be as high as 5%), real-time web performance monitoring, SSL (supposedly and exemption, but not stated any where, and from some posts, not being taken seriously), databases that communicate by IP address (don't ask me), etc. BTW, billing mechanisms are not obviously vacant in dial access systems. Dial access is loaded with different forms of monitoring and billing. Mury
- Previous message: guideline for name-based web hosting justification
- Next message: guideline for name-based web hosting justification
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ARIN-discuss mailing list