guideline for name-based web hosting justification

> You're bending the truth here, quite a bit actually. The HTTP 1.0 proto
> may not support the Host: header, but browsers that are using HTTP 1.0
> may very well support he Host: header. Oh, i don't know, a smallish
> browser called Netscape, v 2.0 or better, comes to mind. Grepping
> through my access log for today I see over 65,000 1.0 requests. 98% of
> those are to name-based virtual hosts (which is almost all i run
> anymore), and they all worked.
> 
> jon


Good to know.  Finally someone takes the time to correct me and not just
call me a whiner.

So, does anyone know a reliable source that keeps track of stats on
browsers?  If it isn't 50% that won't get to the web site, is it
10%? 5%? .0001%?

Thanks.

Mury
GoldenGate Internet Services